|
Five Years After “Mission Accomplished,”John McCain is “Fine” With 100 More |
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado -- Five years ago today, President Bush landed on the
deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and declared that “major combat
operations in Iraq have ended” in front of an enormous banner that
read, “Mission Accomplished.” Around that same time, John McCain said
“it’s clear that the end is very much in sight.” Now -- five years,
4,000 lost lives, and at least $500 billion later -- John McCain says
keeping our troops in Iraq for 100 years would be fine with him.
Instead of outlining a plan for victory and an exit strategy in Iraq,
McCain is offering a long-term troop presence in Iraq similar to our
presence in Germany and South Korea, an approach that he himself admits
won’t work. [ABC News, “Good Morning America,” 4/9/2003]
Despite John McCain’s campaign rhetoric, Colorado voters are not “fine”
with our troops being in Iraq for 100 years under any circumstances. To
date, 56 Coloradans have died serving in Iraq. While just 31 percent of
Americans approve of President Bush's handling of the war, McCain
continues to be one of the most vocal supporters of the President's
failed strategy in Iraq. As the new ad by the Democratic National
Committee this week asks, "If all he offers is more of the same, is
John McCain the right choice for America's future?"
[http://icasualties.org/oif/USCasualtiesByState.aspx; Associated Press,
4/10/08]
http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/04/dnc_ad_on_mccai.php
"John McCain is wrong on Iraq, and the wrong choice for Colorado's
future," said Colorado Democratic Party Chair Pat Waak. "After standing
side-by-side with President Bush as he misled us into war and declared
‘mission accomplished’ before it was over, John McCain has been the
President’s most loyal supporter every step of the way. John McCain
doesn’t understand that Coloradans are not ‘fine’ with our troops
staying in Iraq for 100 years under any circumstances. It is time to
start using some of the $12 billion a month we spend in Iraq to address
the real threats to America's security and invest in confronting the
challenges we face right here at home. Clearly, the only way to do that
is to put a Democrat in the White House.”
May 1, 2003: Bush Declares War Over. “Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.” [Speech by President Bush, 5/1/03]
April 2003: McCain The End Is “Very Much In Sight.” Senator McCain was
asked “At what point will America be able to say the war was won?”
McCain said there were oil fields to secure and “die-hards” to take
care of but “it’s clear that the end is very much in sight, and today I
think Americans should be very proud of their leadership, their
technology…There are still some foreigners, Syrians and others hanging
around. But it won’t be long. It will be a fairly short period of time,
but this happens in wars. I’m confident that once they are confident
the area is no longer a threat to the Marines and to or army troops
that they’ll start imposing discipline. In the meantime, we’ll have a
short period of chaos.” [ABC News, “Good Morning America,” 4/9/2003]
2005: McCain Rejects Korea, Germany Model for Iraq. "In fact, when
asked specifically if he thought the U.S. military should set up shop
in Iraq along the lines of what has been established in post-WWII
Germany or Japan -- something McCain has repeatedly advocated during
the campaign -- the senator offered nothing short of a categorical
'no.' 'I would hope that we could bring them all home,' he said on
MSNBC. 'I would hope that we would probably leave some military
advisers, as we have in other countries, to help them with their
training and equipment and that kind of stuff.' Host Chris Matthews
pressed McCain on the issue. 'You've heard the ideological argument to
keep U.S. forces in the Middle East. I've heard it from the hawks. They
say, keep United States military presence in the Middle East, like we
have with the 7th Fleet in Asia. We have the German...the South Korean
component. Do you think we could get along without it?' McCain held
fast, rejecting the very policy he urges today. 'I not only think we
could get along without it, but I think one of our big problems has
been the fact that many Iraqis resent American military presence,' he
responded. 'And I don't pretend to know exactly Iraqi public opinion.
But as soon as we can reduce our visibility as much as possible, the
better I think it is going to be.'" [Huffington Post, 4/28/08]
January 2005: "Reduce Our Visibility As Much As Possible." "No, I would
hope that we could bring them all home. I would hope that we would
probably leave some military advisors...As soon as we can reduce our
visibility as much as possible I think the better this is going to be."
[MSNBC, 4/29/08: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1iVx4i4tAE]
November 2007: McCain Rejected Korean Analogy to Iraq. Asked by Charlie
Rose if he thought the South Korean model would serve as an "analogy of
where Iraq might be…in terms of an American presence over the next,
say, 20, 25 years," McCain replied, "I don't think so." "Even if there
are no casualties?" Rose questioned. "No," McCain reiterated. "I can
see an American presence for a while. But eventually I think because of
the nature of the society in Iraq and the religious aspects of it that
America eventually withdraws." [The Charlie Rose Show, 11/27/07;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95HVxPuCTes]
January 2008: McCain Said US May Stay In Iraq For 100 Years, Long Term
American Presence In Iraq Analogous To South Korea. At a New Hampshire
town hall when McCain was asked "President Bush has talked about our
staying in Iraq for 50 years." McCain responded: "Maybe 100" and "that
would be fine with me." McCain explained his 100 year remark by drawing
an analogy to the long-term American presence in South Korea: "We've
been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or
so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured
or harmed or wounded or killed." [McCain Town Hall, Derry NH Opera
House, 1/3/2008; New York Times, "The Caucus," 1/11/2008]
|
|
|
